<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help Improve Bock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bock</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73673</link>
		<dc:creator>Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 00:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73673</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  The recent posts tab is supposed to show all the most recent posts, and I haven&#039;t been able to replicate the problem you describe, but I don&#039;t doubt you for a minute.  I know this thing is going to be flaky for a while until we get all the categories sorted out.  It would be very helpful if you could try and recall exactly how you got all those disorganised posts up so that we can get the Geek working on fixing it.

As regards the other point you make, well, all I can say is, y&#039;know, Chinese take-aways might satisfy you for a while but before you know it you&#039;re hungry again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  The recent posts tab is supposed to show all the most recent posts, and I haven&#039;t been able to replicate the problem you describe, but I don&#039;t doubt you for a minute.  I know this thing is going to be flaky for a while until we get all the categories sorted out.  It would be very helpful if you could try and recall exactly how you got all those disorganised posts up so that we can get the Geek working on fixing it.</p>
<p>As regards the other point you make, well, all I can say is, y&#039;know, Chinese take-aways might satisfy you for a while but before you know it you&#039;re hungry again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snookertony</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73672</link>
		<dc:creator>snookertony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 00:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73672</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s me, maybe I&#039;m just getting old but I&#039;m finding it very hard to figure out where the latest post would be. For instance this morning under your heading recent posts  there were posts from all over the place - 2009, 2007, 2008 whatever. Very disorganised.
One thing about the last system was it&#039;s order. Turn on the Bock icon, there was the latest post, top of the list, no messing. Now it&#039;s all over the place. Looking fine and modern but come on lads. Get a bit of order into it.

Maybe I&#039;m getting old. I&#039;m getting more from the other fella these days - you know, five fours...

Sorry &#039;bout that.

thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#039;s me, maybe I&#039;m just getting old but I&#039;m finding it very hard to figure out where the latest post would be. For instance this morning under your heading recent posts  there were posts from all over the place &#8211; 2009, 2007, 2008 whatever. Very disorganised.<br />
One thing about the last system was it&#039;s order. Turn on the Bock icon, there was the latest post, top of the list, no messing. Now it&#039;s all over the place. Looking fine and modern but come on lads. Get a bit of order into it.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#039;m getting old. I&#039;m getting more from the other fella these days &#8211; you know, five fours&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry &#039;bout that.</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50footqueenie</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73181</link>
		<dc:creator>50footqueenie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73181</guid>
		<description>I feel discriminated against - you allow for the provinces in your survey ,but no tick boxes for the Scots.  I may never read your site again, but then again my life is so bereft of entertainment I may have to.  Given there are so many of us overseas types reading your diatribes, can we have a foreigh news section.  PS: I&#039;ve done a day to day body count and your claim of being 20% more offensive is inaccurate - it&#039;s only 16.4% as of yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel discriminated against &#8211; you allow for the provinces in your survey ,but no tick boxes for the Scots.  I may never read your site again, but then again my life is so bereft of entertainment I may have to.  Given there are so many of us overseas types reading your diatribes, can we have a foreigh news section.  PS: I&#039;ve done a day to day body count and your claim of being 20% more offensive is inaccurate &#8211; it&#039;s only 16.4% as of yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bock</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73084</link>
		<dc:creator>Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73084</guid>
		<description>I feel your pain.  It&#039;s an effort for me as well adapting to the new layout, but I&#039;m afraid, folks, we&#039;re not going back to the old design.  This one has more flexibility and allows me to do things I just couldn&#039;t in the past.  As you begin to see new contributors and new options, I hope you&#039;ll appreciate why such a radical change was necessary.  It was either that or remain stuck in a rut.  We must keep evolving and challenging ourselves.  

This site  is just going to get better.  Simple as that.  I&#039;ll publish some stats in the coming week that might surprise you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain.  It&#039;s an effort for me as well adapting to the new layout, but I&#039;m afraid, folks, we&#039;re not going back to the old design.  This one has more flexibility and allows me to do things I just couldn&#039;t in the past.  As you begin to see new contributors and new options, I hope you&#039;ll appreciate why such a radical change was necessary.  It was either that or remain stuck in a rut.  We must keep evolving and challenging ourselves.  </p>
<p>This site  is just going to get better.  Simple as that.  I&#039;ll publish some stats in the coming week that might surprise you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some1lovesU</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73082</link>
		<dc:creator>some1lovesU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73082</guid>
		<description>Well said.  I think going back to the old, different font would help.  And making the name of the post-er bigger like before.  But the most important thing is still the content - and the improved offensiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  I think going back to the old, different font would help.  And making the name of the post-er bigger like before.  But the most important thing is still the content &#8211; and the improved offensiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sniff</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73054</link>
		<dc:creator>Sniff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73054</guid>
		<description>I miss the friendliness of the old sight.  This is tidy but not as warm.   It hink it&#039;s something about the color and the boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the friendliness of the old sight.  This is tidy but not as warm.   It hink it&#039;s something about the color and the boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-73009</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-73009</guid>
		<description>My blog reading has gone very light in recent months, but I still like to catch your posts as often as possible. I mostly read posts in my Google Reader and only occasionally click through. *runs off to do survey now*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog reading has gone very light in recent months, but I still like to catch your posts as often as possible. I mostly read posts in my Google Reader and only occasionally click through. *runs off to do survey now*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagle</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-72929</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-72929</guid>
		<description>Hey Bock,

Form filled, thank you very much. Now, one small thing...

I read Bock regularly but rarely from your actual site - I pick up the posts in my reader (Google Reader). Before your site update (which *is* good), the full post was visible in the reader - I could read it all, then step on to my next feed. Now it only previews a snippit and if I want to, I gotta go to the site and read it all. think of all those tabs and windows open. 

Fair enough, I often do go to www.bock, but I prefer the other way. Is this an, erm, feature or a constraint from the good people of google? Or have I not explored the Reader options as thoroughly as I should have. 

Eagle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bock,</p>
<p>Form filled, thank you very much. Now, one small thing&#8230;</p>
<p>I read Bock regularly but rarely from your actual site &#8211; I pick up the posts in my reader (Google Reader). Before your site update (which *is* good), the full post was visible in the reader &#8211; I could read it all, then step on to my next feed. Now it only previews a snippit and if I want to, I gotta go to the site and read it all. think of all those tabs and windows open. </p>
<p>Fair enough, I often do go to <a href="http://www.bock" rel="nofollow">http://www.bock</a>, but I prefer the other way. Is this an, erm, feature or a constraint from the good people of google? Or have I not explored the Reader options as thoroughly as I should have. </p>
<p>Eagle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nevin</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-72898</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-72898</guid>
		<description>Bock, at the end what matters is ..... does it feel personal to the reader? Can I feel part of your blog on a human level or will it feel disconnected from my reality? 
There are millions of blogs and each and everyone of us is an isolated island, in a vast ocean .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bock, at the end what matters is &#8230;.. does it feel personal to the reader? Can I feel part of your blog on a human level or will it feel disconnected from my reality?<br />
There are millions of blogs and each and everyone of us is an isolated island, in a vast ocean &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some1lovesU</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2009/05/help-improve-bock/comment-page-1/#comment-72885</link>
		<dc:creator>some1lovesU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/?p=4342#comment-72885</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the fix (Re: my #8).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the fix (Re: my #8).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 21/38 queries in 0.102 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 555/608 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bocktherobber.com @ 2012-02-12 00:42:58 -->
