Here is a hard truth that many miss. Who are the Palestinians and what claim do they have to the land. If you want to believe their original argument- that the Jews ran them off in 48, you would have to create "ownership". Who was there first? The Jews can trace their lineage back thousands of years, can the Palestinians? (Define what is a "Palestinian? Is he like an Indian here on the land before Europeans arrived? Is he Persian like in Iraq? Is he Asian with a written history tracing back five thousand years like China? Who is he? You need to define before you can make the claim of ownership.)

Let's agree for a moment both have a right to be there, why isn't there peace? The Israelis respond to attacks. Attacks are "responses to affronts" the Palestinians view as hostile, in their opinion. First they lay claim to a land. Good or bad, right or wrong. Valid or invalid. THEN they say "you are on my land" thus I have the right to murder your babies. The madness of the argument, the poison it brings to THEIR populace (seriously handing out candy?) is indefensible. It also eliminates the argument that the attackers were "radical."

So let's be honest here. It isn't about the land. It is about hatred of Jews. The same hatred that has haunted that culture for thousands of years across the globe. Palestinians are the the newest and easiest manipulated group of haters to come along. Yet, for the first time in several thousand years the Jews have a place to fight back from. And it is driving parts of the rest of the world crazy. You think the Jews believe the Palestinians are "subhuman?" The definition of being called subhuman belongs to how the Jews were treated throughout history by other cultures. For example, Jews were blamed and murdered in Europe for things like the Medieval plague. So being picked on and considered subhuman is something the Jews can probably relate to better than any other culture.

If Israel were your house and the same type of hatred and attacks occurred on your land by your neighbors for sixty years you would respond in the same fashion if not with more violence. That is human nature. The worst part of this is you can't negotiate with hatred. It's is blind to reason.

Further, if the Arab world was truly supportive of the Palestinians being "without a homeland" they could easily cut off a piece of their vast territory and give it to them. But neither the Palestinians NOR the other countries want that. Palestinians would have to learn how not to hate and do something else (obviously creating a decent civilization is beyond them- see how they do without the billions in support they get from us and other nations- much of which Arafat and others stole), but more importantly the rest of the Arab world are REALLY the ones who consider them trouble and "subhuman". They are in a sad way the Arab version or our ghetto/project dwellers, considered not worth the trouble and frankly more trouble than they are worth. I don't think it is fair. All people should be respected and on an individual basis I'm willing to bet a good number are no different than the rest of us hard working people. But they have made a pretty nasty bed for themselves by teaching generation after generation how to hate another people because of their faith. Be fair for a minute and ask yourself this- Name another culture who televises children wishing for the murder of others outside this one? Even the Chinese under Mao did not do things like this and they were very bad actors.

It is what it is. I am sure if given the chance Israel would put down the guns, there is no victory in it for them to continue to fight against the Palestinians. It just they can't, and that family is one reason why.

Aparantly your prescribed response is.
"We usually ignore idiots, unless we can make fun of their stupidity"

Inverted compliment then.

Your "blogsphere" is saturated in inaccuracies, lack of substance and an ill concealed veil of aggression.

You have stated you do not give public interviews or allow photographs, because a "third of muslims want you beheaded"
a touch of paronia based on self importance perhaps ?

You accused President elect Barack Obama of "being supported by every kind of radical muslim"

I have never believed your blogsphere to be linked to Islam.
Rather, I have found it to be a baseless forum on which to hide your real agenda, which you seem to think you can vent on this site, un noticed by those you imagine you impress.

Religion and moderation are opposing forces and you reinforce that belief.

Are you really that much of a retarded fuck as your picture shows? Otherwise, why would you confuse someone who contributes to our blog with members of our group who are CLEARLY marked as Muslims Against Sharia?

stleger norma, could you be more of a dumb nazi cocksucker? You don't give a shit about Muslims, you just hate Jews.