<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politically Correct Terminology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bock</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38655</link>
		<dc:creator>Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38655</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the school give a shit who he invites to his party.  They just don&#039;t want him pulling that stunt in the classroom.  There will be no court case forcing the kid to invite the others to his party.

Convert it to an adult situation.  if a colleague used your workplace to ostentatiously hand out invitations inviting all but one or two people, it could be quite properly construed as bullying.  An employer would have to act if a complaint was made.

If someone did it to me, I&#039;d be offended, right up to the moment I kicked them in the nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think the school give a shit who he invites to his party.  They just don&#039;t want him pulling that stunt in the classroom.  There will be no court case forcing the kid to invite the others to his party.</p>
<p>Convert it to an adult situation.  if a colleague used your workplace to ostentatiously hand out invitations inviting all but one or two people, it could be quite properly construed as bullying.  An employer would have to act if a complaint was made.</p>
<p>If someone did it to me, I&#039;d be offended, right up to the moment I kicked them in the nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoof</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38633</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38633</guid>
		<description>Fair enough Bock, and IF the parents had set up the school to take the hit, it has backfired spectacularly as they&#039;ve certainly managed to put their kid in a far more embarrassing spotlight. That&#039;s still assuming they made him hand out the invites in the classroom and instructed him to ignore his two foes. Sure he could have posted them, but it&#039;s a party for 8-year-olds, and behind it all, are we certain that he was not the one who decided to hold back the invites from his two &quot;enemies&quot;. The parents may not have known any different and just gave him a batch of cards to distribute assuming everyone in class was to get one. It&#039;s hardly a swanky affair with a guest list and caterers (good thing it wasn&#039;t an Irish Communion Party, but I digress) 

If this goes to court and the birthday kid is forced to invite the other two all that proves is that the State now interferes in playground politics. A child can no longer decide who is and isn&#039;t a friend? That smacks of PC gone mad. Will their parents still take them to a party knowing they are not wanted there, with a certain guarantee of ridicule from the other children awaiting them?. And if this is about Ã¢â‚¬Å“human rightsÃ¢â‚¬Å“ then where stand the rights of the child to invite who the hell he wants to his party. 

Worse still though, it makes a mockery of serious Human rights&#039; violations. Being interned, beaten and tortured is a violation of human rights. Not getting an invite to a birthday party is hardly comparable.

True it is not a nice experience for any child whether this act of vindictiveness was carried out on the childs or parents part, but we know how cruel kids can be when it comes to politics of the classroom. If the parents put him up to it then for shame but it should be kept in proportion even at that.

Kids are usually far better than adults at working out their differences in a few days or weeks - they move on, theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re very busy people who donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t tend to bear grudges for too long. 

However when adults and the State start making a mountain out of a molehill they might just turn these youngsters into bitter people a lot sooner than life will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough Bock, and IF the parents had set up the school to take the hit, it has backfired spectacularly as they&#039;ve certainly managed to put their kid in a far more embarrassing spotlight. That&#039;s still assuming they made him hand out the invites in the classroom and instructed him to ignore his two foes. Sure he could have posted them, but it&#039;s a party for 8-year-olds, and behind it all, are we certain that he was not the one who decided to hold back the invites from his two &#034;enemies&#034;. The parents may not have known any different and just gave him a batch of cards to distribute assuming everyone in class was to get one. It&#039;s hardly a swanky affair with a guest list and caterers (good thing it wasn&#039;t an Irish Communion Party, but I digress) </p>
<p>If this goes to court and the birthday kid is forced to invite the other two all that proves is that the State now interferes in playground politics. A child can no longer decide who is and isn&#039;t a friend? That smacks of PC gone mad. Will their parents still take them to a party knowing they are not wanted there, with a certain guarantee of ridicule from the other children awaiting them?. And if this is about Ã¢â‚¬Å“human rightsÃ¢â‚¬Å“ then where stand the rights of the child to invite who the hell he wants to his party. </p>
<p>Worse still though, it makes a mockery of serious Human rights&#039; violations. Being interned, beaten and tortured is a violation of human rights. Not getting an invite to a birthday party is hardly comparable.</p>
<p>True it is not a nice experience for any child whether this act of vindictiveness was carried out on the childs or parents part, but we know how cruel kids can be when it comes to politics of the classroom. If the parents put him up to it then for shame but it should be kept in proportion even at that.</p>
<p>Kids are usually far better than adults at working out their differences in a few days or weeks &#8211; they move on, theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re very busy people who donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t tend to bear grudges for too long. </p>
<p>However when adults and the State start making a mountain out of a molehill they might just turn these youngsters into bitter people a lot sooner than life will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bock</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38605</link>
		<dc:creator>Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38605</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t see that as a PC matter at all.

Apparently all but two of the children in the class received invitations. 

Isolation and exclusion are classic bullying techniques, and it seems that in this case the school was being used to isolate those two children.

It doesn&#039;t matter what the reasons were.  No school could tolerate being used like that, and if it was done to a child of mine I&#039;d be extremely annoyed.

If the birthday boy or his parents didn&#039;t want to invite these kids, they should have sent the invitations by post or delivered them some other way. You can&#039;t have a classroom being used to humiliate certain children.  

It seems to me that the parents are small-minded, vindictive fuckers who are passing on their miserable ways to their child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#039;t see that as a PC matter at all.</p>
<p>Apparently all but two of the children in the class received invitations. </p>
<p>Isolation and exclusion are classic bullying techniques, and it seems that in this case the school was being used to isolate those two children.</p>
<p>It doesn&#039;t matter what the reasons were.  No school could tolerate being used like that, and if it was done to a child of mine I&#039;d be extremely annoyed.</p>
<p>If the birthday boy or his parents didn&#039;t want to invite these kids, they should have sent the invitations by post or delivered them some other way. You can&#039;t have a classroom being used to humiliate certain children.  </p>
<p>It seems to me that the parents are small-minded, vindictive fuckers who are passing on their miserable ways to their child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoof</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38570</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38570</guid>
		<description>The PC Nazis have reached a new low. This story from Sweden.:

&quot;An eight-year-old boy has sparked an unlikely outcry in Sweden after failing to invite two of his classmates to his birthday party. 

The boy&#039;s school says he has violated the children&#039;s rights and has complained to the Swedish Parliament. 

The school, in Lund argues that if invitations are handed out on school premises then it must ensure there is no discrimination. 

The boy&#039;s father has lodged a complaint with the parliamentary ombudsman. 

He says the two children were left out because one did not invite his son to his own party and he had fallen out with the other one. 

The boy handed out his birthday invitations during class-time and when the teacher spotted that two children had not received one the invitations were confiscated.&quot;

.........For fuck&#039;s sake, is that all these pricks have to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PC Nazis have reached a new low. This story from Sweden.:</p>
<p>&#034;An eight-year-old boy has sparked an unlikely outcry in Sweden after failing to invite two of his classmates to his birthday party. </p>
<p>The boy&#039;s school says he has violated the children&#039;s rights and has complained to the Swedish Parliament. </p>
<p>The school, in Lund argues that if invitations are handed out on school premises then it must ensure there is no discrimination. </p>
<p>The boy&#039;s father has lodged a complaint with the parliamentary ombudsman. </p>
<p>He says the two children were left out because one did not invite his son to his own party and he had fallen out with the other one. </p>
<p>The boy handed out his birthday invitations during class-time and when the teacher spotted that two children had not received one the invitations were confiscated.&#034;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;For fuck&#039;s sake, is that all these pricks have to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: problemchildbride</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38430</link>
		<dc:creator>problemchildbride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38430</guid>
		<description>Do you know what they&#039;re calling kids who have to repeat a year here now?

Deferred Achievers.

I ask you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know what they&#039;re calling kids who have to repeat a year here now?</p>
<p>Deferred Achievers.</p>
<p>I ask you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Mist</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38342</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Mist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38342</guid>
		<description>Parkenstein is back then. Did he bring the equipment? The moon will be in Cancer later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parkenstein is back then. Did he bring the equipment? The moon will be in Cancer later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: His Girl Friday</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38302</link>
		<dc:creator>His Girl Friday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38302</guid>
		<description>yep, they&#039;re takin&#039; over the world, I tell ya...

ya&#039;ll should a told her to quit gettin&#039; her knickers in a knot...it&#039;s offensive to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, they&#039;re takin&#039; over the world, I tell ya&#8230;</p>
<p>ya&#039;ll should a told her to quit gettin&#039; her knickers in a knot&#8230;it&#039;s offensive to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clogoz1</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38284</link>
		<dc:creator>clogoz1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38284</guid>
		<description>Bock I have to say that I find you so entertaining to read your articles are great.
Living in Oz I&#039;m some what alien to Irish politics.
But I do so enjoy your articles,thank you.:0)
I&#039;ve set Bocktherobber as my homepage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bock I have to say that I find you so entertaining to read your articles are great.<br />
Living in Oz I&#039;m some what alien to Irish politics.<br />
But I do so enjoy your articles,thank you.:0)<br />
I&#039;ve set Bocktherobber as my homepage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38177</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38177</guid>
		<description>I have the &#039;tentative inclination&#039; that that &#039;person of gender&#039; is talking through her &#039;displaced homeowner.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the &#039;tentative inclination&#039; that that &#039;person of gender&#039; is talking through her &#039;displaced homeowner.&#039;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clogoz1</title>
		<link>http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-38158</link>
		<dc:creator>clogoz1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bocktherobber.com/2008/06/politically-correct-terminology#comment-38158</guid>
		<description>^Caring Speak^ I must remember that next time I state the bleeding obvious,and it&#039;s great to know that I&#039;m actually differently beautiful when I know I can&#039;t use a hammer with my left hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Caring Speak^ I must remember that next time I state the bleeding obvious,and it&#039;s great to know that I&#039;m actually differently beautiful when I know I can&#039;t use a hammer with my left hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 567/606 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bocktherobber.com @ 2012-02-12 05:11:49 -->
